RAJESHWAR KUMAR SHARMA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/27527/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010806082026

Filing Number

CRM-M/37717/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/27527/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Category

38.29 - QUASHING PET U/S 482 CRPC GEN IN U/S 138 NI ACT ( 649 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESHWAR KUMAR SHARMA

    Adv. Manoj Kumar Sharma

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.SARABJIT SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/27527/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana directed the Additional District Sessions Judge, Hoshiarpur to expeditiously decide a pending application filed on 28.10.2024 by petitioner Rajeshwar Kumar Sharma. The application sought cancellation of bail and surety bonds of Sarabjit Singh, who had allegedly violated conditions of a sentence suspension order in a cheque bounce case (Section 138 NIA), where he was originally convicted to 2 years imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 30 lakhs compensation. The court disposed the petition with directions to the lower court to decide the matter speedily, citing speedy trial as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/27527/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/27527/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana directed the Additional District Sessions Judge, Hoshiarpur to expeditiously decide a pending application filed on 28.10.2024 by petitioner Rajeshwar Kumar Sharma. The application sought cancellation of bail and surety bonds of Sarabjit Singh, who had allegedly violated conditions of a sentence suspension order in a cheque bounce case (Section 138 NIA), where he was originally convicted to 2 years imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 30 lakhs compensation. The court disposed the petition with directions to the lower court to decide the matter speedily, citing speedy trial as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case