KHOKHAN HAWALDAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/26888/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010805802026

Filing Number

CRM-M/37591/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26888/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHOKHAN HAWALDAR

    Adv. ARJUN DHINGRA

  2. 2.KHOKAN HAWLADAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.KHOKAN HAWLADAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/26888/2026 Court Decision (15.05.2026): The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Khokhan Hawaldar's petition for pre-arrest bail as not maintainable. The court held that once an accused is arrested and produced before a magistrate—even if granted interim/transit bail—they are deemed in "constructive custody," making pre-arrest bail petitions no longer available; only regular bail under Sections 437 or 439 CrPC remains an option. Key Reasoning: The petitioner was apprehended at Kolkata airport under a Look-Out Circular, produced before a West Bengal magistrate who granted interim/transit bail with directions to appear in Ludhiana by May 12, 2026. Following Supreme Court precedent (*Dhanraj Aswani v. Amar S. Mulchandani*), the court found that execution of a valid arrest warrant terminates pre-arrest bail eligibility, regardless of subsequent transit bail benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26888/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/26888/2026 Court Decision (15.05.2026): The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Khokhan Hawaldar's petition for pre-arrest bail as not maintainable. The court held that once an accused is arrested and produced before a magistrate—even if granted interim/transit bail—they are deemed in "constructive custody," making pre-arrest bail petitions no longer available; only regular bail under Sections 437 or 439 CrPC remains an option. Key Reasoning: The petitioner was apprehended at Kolkata airport under a Look-Out Circular, produced before a West Bengal magistrate who granted interim/transit bail with directions to appear in Ludhiana by May 12, 2026. Following Supreme Court precedent (*Dhanraj Aswani v. Amar S. Mulchandani*), the court found that execution of a valid arrest warrant terminates pre-arrest bail eligibility, regardless of subsequent transit bail benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case