LEELAWATI vs RAMESHWAR — RSA/1855/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010805522026

Filing Number

RSA/29180/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

RSA/1855/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor

Coram

Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LEELAWATI

    Adv. NISCHAL CHETANYA MANCHANDA

  2. 2.LEELAWATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHWAR

  2. 2.LEELAWATI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh RathorView PDF

    Case Summary: RSA 1855/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed Leelawati's second appeal challenging the trial and appellate courts' decrees for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 20.01.2015. The court upheld findings that the defendant executed the agreement to sell her property for ₹60 lakhs (₹40 lakhs earnest money paid), but wrongfully refused to execute the sale deed, while the plaintiff remained ready and willing to perform. The court rejected the defendant's fraud allegations (claiming her thumb impressions were obtained on blank papers through collusion with her son), finding the document alignment and witness testimonies credible, and dismissed arguments about suspicious timing and plaintiff's financial capacity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/1855/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RSA 1855/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed Leelawati's second appeal challenging the trial and appellate courts' decrees for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 20.01.2015. The court upheld findings that the defendant executed the agreement to sell her property for ₹60 lakhs (₹40 lakhs earnest money paid), but wrongfully refused to execute the sale deed, while the plaintiff remained ready and willing to perform. The court rejected the defendant's fraud allegations (claiming her thumb impressions were obtained on blank papers through collusion with her son), finding the document alignment and witness testimonies credible, and dismissed arguments about suspicious timing and plaintiff's financial capacity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case