RANDHIR SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/27021/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010805272026

Filing Number

CRM-M/37568/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/27021/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANDHIR SINGH

    Adv. PARVEEN CHAUHAN

  2. 2.RANDHIR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.RANDHIR SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Randhir Singh's anticipatory bail petition in a narcotic drugs case, finding it non-maintainable as a successive application. The court noted that Singh had previously withdrawn an identical petition on 11.11.2025 with liberty to surrender and file bail before the trial court, but failed to do so, and Singh's counsel provided no changed circumstances warranting reconsideration. Citing Supreme Court precedent, the court held that successive anticipatory bail applications should not be entertained on specious grounds of changed circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/27021/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Randhir Singh's anticipatory bail petition in a narcotic drugs case, finding it non-maintainable as a successive application. The court noted that Singh had previously withdrawn an identical petition on 11.11.2025 with liberty to surrender and file bail before the trial court, but failed to do so, and Singh's counsel provided no changed circumstances warranting reconsideration. Citing Supreme Court precedent, the court held that successive anticipatory bail applications should not be entertained on specious grounds of changed circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case