PARTAP AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/14846/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 14. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010804842026

e-Filing Number

07-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29177/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14846/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Category

58.26 - SERVICE-ENGINEERING-HARYANA(PWD,B&R&PUBLIC HEALTH ( 716 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARTAP AND OTHERS

    Adv. DEEPAK JAGLAN

  2. 2.Partap and Others

  3. 3.Chief Canal Officer, BWS Unit

  4. 4.Superintending Canal Officer

  5. 5.Robin Sharma

  6. 6.Ravi Shankar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Partap and Others

  3. 3.Chief Canal Officer, BWS Unit

  4. 4.Superintending Canal Officer

  5. 5.Robin Sharma

  6. 6.Ravi Shankar

  7. 7.Sub Divisional Officer Kaithal

  8. 8.Sub Divisional Officer Cheeka

  9. 9.Sub Divisional Officer, Saraswati Water Service

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. The petitioners challenged a January 2025 termination order, arguing it violated the Haryana Contractual Employees (Security of Service) Act 2024, which protects HKRNL employees with 5+ years of service until superannuation. The court found the termination order illegal and arbitrary but allowed withdrawal to enable the petitioners to file a fresh petition with better particulars. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14846/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. The petitioners challenged a January 2025 termination order, arguing it violated the Haryana Contractual Employees (Security of Service) Act 2024, which protects HKRNL employees with 5+ years of service until superannuation. The court found the termination order illegal and arbitrary but allowed withdrawal to enable the petitioners to file a fresh petition with better particulars. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case