MANDEV SINGH DHILLON vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRM-M/26968/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010803342026

Filing Number

CRM-M/37540/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26968/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Category

47 - CRIMINAL MISC.(DIRECTION) ( 215 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANDEV SINGH DHILLON

    Adv. RAGHAV SONI

  2. 2.mandev singh dhillon

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.mandev singh dhillon

  3. 3.DGP PUNJAB

  4. 4.SSP AMRITSAR

  5. 5.SHO (Station House Officer) LOPOKE

  6. 6.SUCHA SINGH

  7. 7.GUPREET SINGH

  8. 8.PARAMAJIT SINGH

  9. 9.DILBAG SINGH

  10. 10.TARSEM SINGH

  11. 11.GURDIAL SINGH

  12. 12.PUNJAB SINGH

  13. 13.PALWINDER SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-26968-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition by directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, Rural Amritsar (Respondent No. 3) to consider and decide the petitioner's representation regarding FIR No. 231 (involving charges under IPC sections 452, 323, 325, 506, 148, 149) within four weeks in accordance with law. The court granted the petitioner's limited prayer for expedited consideration of his pending representation after finding it had received no action since May 9, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26968/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-26968-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition by directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, Rural Amritsar (Respondent No. 3) to consider and decide the petitioner's representation regarding FIR No. 231 (involving charges under IPC sections 452, 323, 325, 506, 148, 149) within four weeks in accordance with law. The court granted the petitioner's limited prayer for expedited consideration of his pending representation after finding it had received no action since May 9, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case