VIJAY KUMAR ANAMIKA vs PEPSU ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION — CWP/14824/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010803312026

e-Filing Number

10-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29111/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14824/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Category

20.5 - SC OSB (PUNJAB) RETIRAL BENEFITS ( 467 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY KUMAR ANAMIKA

  2. 2.Vijay Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PEPSU ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

  2. 2.Vijay Kumar

  3. 3.Managing Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/14824/2026 Vijay Kumar, a PRTC conductor, sought pension and retiral benefits under PRTC Regulations 1992. After being exonerated of fraud charges but found guilty of indiscipline in 2001, he was dismissed in 2003. Despite a 2023 court order directing reinstatement with consequential benefits, PRTC failed to comply and rejected his 2025 representation claiming dues were already paid. The court directed PRTC's Managing Director to consider his legal notice of 18.02.2026 and pass a reasoned order within three months, granting relief if found entitled, without addressing the underlying pension dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14824/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/14824/2026 Vijay Kumar, a PRTC conductor, sought pension and retiral benefits under PRTC Regulations 1992. After being exonerated of fraud charges but found guilty of indiscipline in 2001, he was dismissed in 2003. Despite a 2023 court order directing reinstatement with consequential benefits, PRTC failed to comply and rejected his 2025 representation claiming dues were already paid. The court directed PRTC's Managing Director to consider his legal notice of 18.02.2026 and pass a reasoned order within three months, granting relief if found entitled, without addressing the underlying pension dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case