KAJAL FOODS vs M/S A.S. FROZEN FOODS — CR/4086/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010801322026

Filing Number

CR/29072/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CR/4086/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh Grewal

Category

30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAJAL FOODS

    Adv. RESHABH BAJAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S A.S. FROZEN FOODS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh GrewalView PDF

    Case Summary: CR/4086/2026 Kajal Jindal v. M/s A.S. Frozen Foods The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Kajal Jindal's revision petition and set aside the lower court's order striking off her defense. The trial court had struck off her defense for failing to file a written statement after her application to reject the plaint was dismissed. Justice Amarinder Singh Grewal held that in the interest of justice, the defendant deserved one opportunity to file the written statement so the suit for ₹5,00,000 damages could be adjudicated on merits. The petitioner was granted this opportunity subject to depositing ₹5,000 with the District Legal Services Authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/4086/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR/4086/2026 Kajal Jindal v. M/s A.S. Frozen Foods The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Kajal Jindal's revision petition and set aside the lower court's order striking off her defense. The trial court had struck off her defense for failing to file a written statement after her application to reject the plaint was dismissed. Justice Amarinder Singh Grewal held that in the interest of justice, the defendant deserved one opportunity to file the written statement so the suit for ₹5,00,000 damages could be adjudicated on merits. The petitioner was granted this opportunity subject to depositing ₹5,000 with the District Legal Services Authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case