GULZARI LAL JINDAL vs M/S A.S. FROZEN FOODS — CR/4065/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010801302026

Filing Number

CR/29086/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CR/4065/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULZARI LAL JINDAL

    Adv. RESHABH BAJAJ

  2. 2.GULAZARI LAL JINDAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S A.S. FROZEN FOODS

  2. 2.GULAZARI LAL JINDAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh GrewalView PDF

    Case Summary: CR/4065/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside the lower court's order striking off the defendant's defense, holding that the petitioner deserves a fair opportunity to file a written statement in the suit for ₹5 lakh damages filed by M/s A.S. Frozen Foods. The court reasoned that since the earlier application challenging the plaint was dismissed, justice requires the defendant be allowed to defend the case on merits rather than be barred by procedural default. The petitioner must deposit ₹5,000 as costs with the District Legal Services Authority before filing the written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/4065/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR/4065/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside the lower court's order striking off the defendant's defense, holding that the petitioner deserves a fair opportunity to file a written statement in the suit for ₹5 lakh damages filed by M/s A.S. Frozen Foods. The court reasoned that since the earlier application challenging the plaint was dismissed, justice requires the defendant be allowed to defend the case on merits rather than be barred by procedural default. The petitioner must deposit ₹5,000 as costs with the District Legal Services Authority before filing the written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case