DEEPAK JAIN vs GAUTAM JAIN AND OTHERS — CR/4049/2026
Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010800852026
Filing Number
CR/29028/2026
Filing Date
11-May-2026
Registration No
CR/4049/2026
Registration Date
11-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
Coram
Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
Category
30.2 - CIVIL REVISION(RENT) ( 514 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEEPAK JAIN
Adv. MANI RAM VERMA
-
2.GAUTAM JAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.GAUTAM JAIN AND OTHERS
-
2.GAUTAM JAIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF
Case Summary: CR/4049/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside the Executing Court's order requiring notice to tenants before executing an ejectment decree. The Court held that since execution was filed within two years of the ejectment order (02.01.2026 to 28.04.2026), notice under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC was not mandatory—such notice is required only for stale executions beyond two years or against legal representatives. The Court directed immediate execution, noting that pending appeal without a stay order does not prevent decree execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CR/4049/2026
Case Summary: CR/4049/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside the Executing Court's order requiring notice to tenants before executing an ejectment decree. The Court held that since execution was filed within two years of the ejectment order (02.01.2026 to 28.04.2026), notice under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC was not mandatory—such notice is required only for stale executions beyond two years or against legal representatives. The Court directed immediate execution, noting that pending appeal without a stay order does not prevent decree execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts