SANSAR CHAND RANA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/14946/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010800452026
e-Filing Number
09-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/29039/2026
Filing Date
11-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/14946/2026
Registration Date
12-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger
Category
31.2 - MUNICIPAL & PANCHAYAT LAWS ( 559 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANSAR CHAND RANA
Adv. KULWINDER KAUR
-
2.Sansar Chand Rana
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
-
2.Sansar Chand Rana
-
3.Director Department of Local Government
-
4.Executive Officer
-
5.Assistant Twon Planner
-
6.Building Inspector
-
7.Gurpreet Kaur
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/14946/2026 Sansar Chand Rana petitioned for a writ of mandamus directing municipal authorities to take action against illegal and unauthorized construction at House No. 427, Badal Colony, Zirakpur (District S.A.S. Nagar), allegedly constructed without building plan approval by respondent Gurpreet Kaur. The court disposed of the petition after the municipal authorities represented that they had already initiated action against the illegal construction and undertook to complete proceedings within three months while affording due hearing to all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/14946/2026
Case Summary: CWP/14946/2026 Sansar Chand Rana petitioned for a writ of mandamus directing municipal authorities to take action against illegal and unauthorized construction at House No. 427, Badal Colony, Zirakpur (District S.A.S. Nagar), allegedly constructed without building plan approval by respondent Gurpreet Kaur. The court disposed of the petition after the municipal authorities represented that they had already initiated action against the illegal construction and undertook to complete proceedings within three months while affording due hearing to all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts