SHISH PAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/14746/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010800062026

e-Filing Number

08-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29014/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14746/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Category

58.2 - GOVT SERVICE (HY) PENSION/RETIRAL BENEFIT ( 712 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHISH PAL

    Adv. RAVINDER MALIK

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.Transport Commissioner, Haryana

  4. 4.District Transport Officer cum Secretary

  5. 5.Principal Accountant General

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/14746/2026 Shish Pal sought mandamus directing Haryana State to pay Group Insurance Scheme contributions, retrial dues (gratuity, leave encashment, pension), and 18% interest on delayed payments. The court disposed of the petition by directing the State to decide the petitioner's representation dated 24.03.2026 after providing hearing within eight weeks and issuing a reasoned order, with a copy supplied within one week thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14746/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/14746/2026 Shish Pal sought mandamus directing Haryana State to pay Group Insurance Scheme contributions, retrial dues (gratuity, leave encashment, pension), and 18% interest on delayed payments. The court disposed of the petition by directing the State to decide the petitioner's representation dated 24.03.2026 after providing hearing within eight weeks and issuing a reasoned order, with a copy supplied within one week thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case