VIKAS KAMBOJ vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/14825/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 14 and 16. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010800052026

e-Filing Number

08-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29013/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14825/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Category

68.11 - SERVICE-SECONDARY EDU-PUNJAB (PGT) ( 772 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14 and 16

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKAS KAMBOJ

    Adv. Ranbir Singh Pathania

  2. 2.State of Punjab and Others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Punjab and Others

  3. 3.Directorate of School Education (Secondary) Punjab

  4. 4.Assistant Director (Promotion Cell), Department of School Education, Government of Punjab

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP-14825-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of Vikas Kamboj's petition challenging his posting order dated 24.09.2024, without deciding the merits. The court directed the State of Punjab to consider and decide his pending representation (dated 24.04.2026) expeditiously within 6 weeks by passing a reasoned order after providing him a hearing opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14825/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP-14825-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of Vikas Kamboj's petition challenging his posting order dated 24.09.2024, without deciding the merits. The court directed the State of Punjab to consider and decide his pending representation (dated 24.04.2026) expeditiously within 6 weeks by passing a reasoned order after providing him a hearing opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case