SATYAWATI vs STATE OF HARYANA — CWP/15237/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section Article 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010799272026

e-Filing Number

07-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28956/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15237/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Category

18.11 - LAND LAWS S.B. ( 448 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section Article 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATYAWATI

    Adv. VEENA HOODA

  2. 2.State of Haryana

  3. 3.Satander

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.State of Haryana

  3. 3.Satander

  4. 4.Assistant Collector

  5. 5.Krishna Devi

  6. 6.Ajay

  7. 7.Smt Jiwani

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP-15237-2026 The petitioners sought a writ of Mandamus to direct the Assistant Collector, Julana, District Jind to expedite pending partition proceedings. The State of Haryana accepted notice and committed to concluding the partition proceedings within three months from the date of hearing, subject to legal impediments. The court disposed of the petition based on this undertaking without requiring further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15237/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP-15237-2026 The petitioners sought a writ of Mandamus to direct the Assistant Collector, Julana, District Jind to expedite pending partition proceedings. The State of Haryana accepted notice and committed to concluding the partition proceedings within three months from the date of hearing, subject to legal impediments. The court disposed of the petition based on this undertaking without requiring further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case