ASHISH KUMAR TIWARI vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/27491/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010799212026

Filing Number

CRM-M/37312/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/27491/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

38.1 - QUASHING PETITIONS I/O ( 152 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHISH KUMAR TIWARI

    Adv. IMITYAZ HUSSAIN

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/27491/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed Ashish Kumar Tiwari's petition and ordered release of his vehicle (DL-1LAN-8881) on superdari (custody), setting aside orders by the ACJM, Additional Sessions Judge, SDM, and Deputy Commissioner that had denied release or ordered confiscation. The vehicle was seized in FIR No.200 under the Haryana Gauvansh Protection Act and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act after the petitioner accepted a livestock transport booking. The court held that seized vehicles can be released on superdari to registered owners if likely to deteriorate in police custody and owner satisfies court conditions, especially where the vehicle is the owner's sole livelihood and trial will be lengthy. The trial court retains authority to impose conditions as necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/27491/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/27491/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed Ashish Kumar Tiwari's petition and ordered release of his vehicle (DL-1LAN-8881) on superdari (custody), setting aside orders by the ACJM, Additional Sessions Judge, SDM, and Deputy Commissioner that had denied release or ordered confiscation. The vehicle was seized in FIR No.200 under the Haryana Gauvansh Protection Act and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act after the petitioner accepted a livestock transport booking. The court held that seized vehicles can be released on superdari to registered owners if likely to deteriorate in police custody and owner satisfies court conditions, especially where the vehicle is the owner's sole livelihood and trial will be lengthy. The trial court retains authority to impose conditions as necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case