NACHHATAR SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS — CWP/14907/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010798462026
e-Filing Number
08-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/28942/2026
Filing Date
08-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/14907/2026
Registration Date
11-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger
Category
31.2 - MUNICIPAL & PANCHAYAT LAWS ( 559 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NACHHATAR SINGH
Adv. VAISHALI KAMBOJ
-
2.Nachhatar Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS
-
2.Nachhatar Singh
-
3.Director
-
4.Deputy Commissioner
-
5.Block Development and Panchayat Officer
-
6.Chief Vigilance Officer
-
7.Gurvinder Singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF
Case Summary: CWP-14907-2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition seeking a mandamus to conclude proceedings against the former Sarpanch of village Mandheri, Kurukshetra, after the State informed the court that the inquiry proceedings had already been concluded and the complaint closed by the Chief Vigilance Officer on 13.02.2026. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedies against the complaint closure in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/14907/2026
Case Summary: CWP-14907-2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition seeking a mandamus to conclude proceedings against the former Sarpanch of village Mandheri, Kurukshetra, after the State informed the court that the inquiry proceedings had already been concluded and the complaint closed by the Chief Vigilance Officer on 13.02.2026. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedies against the complaint closure in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts