JAIBEER AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/14614/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010797162026
e-Filing Number
08-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/28881/2026
Filing Date
08-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/14614/2026
Registration Date
08-May-2026
Judge
Mrs. Justice Alka Sarin , Justice (To Be Nominated)
Coram
Mrs. Justice Alka Sarin , Justice (To Be Nominated)
Category
18.12 - LAND LAWS D.B. ( 449 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAIBEER AND OTHERS
Adv. SANDEEP SIWACH
-
2.jaibeer and others
-
3.Deputy Commissioner
-
4.Tehsildar, Village Dhani Bhojraj
-
5.Block Development and Panchayat
-
6.Gram Panchayat,
-
7.jagmal
-
8.desraj
-
9.mahender singh
-
10.ramesh kumar
-
11.tara chand
-
12.surjit
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
-
2.jaibeer and others
-
3.Deputy Commissioner
-
4.Tehsildar, Village Dhani Bhojraj
-
5.Block Development and Panchayat
-
6.Gram Panchayat,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Mrs. Justice Alka Sarin,justice (To Be Nominated)View PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Collector-cum-Deputy Commissioner, Fatehabad, to expeditiously decide the petitioners' stay application filed on 27.04.2026, which had remained pending without any order despite being a statutory appeal. The court ordered that no coercive action be taken against the petitioners until the stay application is decided, thereby granting the petitioners' limited prayer for time-bound disposal of their stay plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/14614/2026
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Collector-cum-Deputy Commissioner, Fatehabad, to expeditiously decide the petitioners' stay application filed on 27.04.2026, which had remained pending without any order despite being a statutory appeal. The court ordered that no coercive action be taken against the petitioners until the stay application is decided, thereby granting the petitioners' limited prayer for time-bound disposal of their stay plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts