AKASH AND ORS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR — CRM-M/28054/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010796542025

Filing Number

CRM-M/41715/2025

Filing Date

15-May-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/28054/2025

Registration Date

19-May-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKASH AND ORS

    Adv. SAKSHAM MALHOTRA

  2. 2.AKASH

  3. 3.YASH

  4. 4.SUJAL

  5. 5.SUMIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

  2. 2.AKASH

  3. 3.DHARAMBEER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vinod S. BhardwajView PDF

    SUMMARY The Punjab & Haryana High Court quashed FIR No.26 (2024) against four young accused aged 18-24 years involving charges of wrongful restraint, assault, and causing grievous injury, after all parties reached a voluntary settlement. The court found the compromise genuine and bonafide, noted the case was at an early investigative stage, determined conviction chances were remote given the complainant's withdrawal of support, and concluded continuing proceedings would serve no public purpose while causing hardship to the young accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/28054/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The Punjab & Haryana High Court quashed FIR No.26 (2024) against four young accused aged 18-24 years involving charges of wrongful restraint, assault, and causing grievous injury, after all parties reached a voluntary settlement. The court found the compromise genuine and bonafide, noted the case was at an early investigative stage, determined conviction chances were remote given the complainant's withdrawal of support, and concluded continuing proceedings would serve no public purpose while causing hardship to the young accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case