SATISH AND ANOTHER vs THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND OTHERS — CWP/15096/2026

Case under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010796012026

e-Filing Number

07-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28829/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15096/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Coram

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Category

63.72 - MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS/SENIOR CITIZENS ( 764 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATISH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. RAMESH HOODA

  2. 2.Satish and another

  3. 3.The Maintenance Tribunal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Satish and another

  3. 3.The Maintenance Tribunal

  4. 4.Umed Singh

  5. 5.Jaiprakash

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of this writ petition challenging orders from the Maintenance Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The court closed the petition after noting that it had already set aside the impugned orders in a related case (CWP-8242-2026) for being passed *coram non judice*, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication, making further proceedings unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15096/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of this writ petition challenging orders from the Maintenance Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The court closed the petition after noting that it had already set aside the impugned orders in a related case (CWP-8242-2026) for being passed *coram non judice*, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication, making further proceedings unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case