KEWAL KRISHAN CONTRACTOR vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/14914/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010795932026

e-Filing Number

08-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28832/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14914/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Category

63.66 - CASE RLT TO REL OF PAY OF WRK DON UND ORD GOVT FUN ( 759 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KEWAL KRISHAN CONTRACTOR

    Adv. CHIRAG GIRDHAR

  2. 2.Kewal Krishan Contractor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Kewal Krishan Contractor

  3. 3.The Chief Engineer

  4. 4.The Superintending Engineer

  5. 5.The Executive Engineer

  6. 6.The Additional Deputy Commissioner Rural Development cum Additional District Programme Coordina

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Summary of CWP-14914-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the State of Punjab to release payment to contractor Kewal Krishan for work performed within 4 months, with 9% per annum interest if payment is delayed beyond that period. The court disposed of the petition based on the state's undertaking that a competent authority would assess the contractor's admitted liability and discharge it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14914/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP-14914-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the State of Punjab to release payment to contractor Kewal Krishan for work performed within 4 months, with 9% per annum interest if payment is delayed beyond that period. The court disposed of the petition based on the state's undertaking that a competent authority would assess the contractor's admitted liability and discharge it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case