NAND KISHORE AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/14597/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010795852026

e-Filing Number

08-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28810/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14597/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Category

97.5 - VIRES (GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS) ( 868 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAND KISHORE AND OTHERS

    Adv. MANJU GOYAL

  2. 2.Nand Kishore And Others

  3. 3.Avinash Kumar

  4. 4.Additional Chief Secretary

  5. 5.Dalbir Singh

  6. 6.Nirajan Pal Singh

  7. 7.Nasib Singh

  8. 8.Rajender Kumar

  9. 9.Jila Singh

  10. 10.Gulzar Singh

  11. 11.Ved Parkash

  12. 12.Ashok Kumar

  13. 13.Hukam Chand

  14. 14.Varyam Singh

  15. 15.Dharm Pal

  16. 16.Sunil Kumar

  17. 17.Sukhdev Kumar

  18. 18.Shyam Lal

  19. 19.Jangbir Singh

  20. 20.Subhash Chander

  21. 21.Surjeet Singh

  22. 22.Ritu Rani

  23. 23.Nishan Singh

  24. 24.Suba Singh

  25. 25.Om Parkash Mehra

  26. 26.Prem Lata

  27. 27.Surjit Singh

  28. 28.Pooja Rani

  29. 29.Hari Kishan

  30. 30.Dalip Kumar

  31. 31.Rajender Kumar Sharma

  32. 32.Rai Singh

  33. 33.Pritam Singh

  34. 34.Arjun Das

  35. 35.Amar Singh

  36. 36.Umadutt Sharma

  37. 37.Gulshan Kumar Chabra

  38. 38.Dharampal Sharma

  39. 39.Ashok Kumar

  40. 40.Anand Kumar Rampal

  41. 41.Joga Singh

  42. 42.Shekher Chander

  43. 43.Ramesh Kumar Ahuja

  44. 44.Gian Chand Sharma

  45. 45.Mohamad Hassan

  46. 46.Mahesh Kumar

  47. 47.Saroj Bala

  48. 48.Shakuntla Rani

  49. 49.Brij Mohan

  50. 50.Yashpal Sharma

  51. 51.Suman Gupta

  52. 52.Brij Bhushan

  53. 53.Inder Sain

  54. 54.Ved Parkash

  55. 55.Sharwan Kumar

  56. 56.Amrinder Singh

  57. 57.Joginder Pal

  58. 58.Sandhya Behl

  59. 59.Krishna Rani

  60. 60.Tara Bhutani

  61. 61.Sohan Lal

  62. 62.Gurwant Singh

  63. 63.Bhagwan Dass

  64. 64.Raj Kumar

  65. 65.Sugan Chand

  66. 66.Matru Mal Garg

  67. 67.Sunil Kumar

  68. 68.Surender Sharma

  69. 69.Anil Kumar

  70. 70.Jagir Singh

  71. 71.Yash Pal

  72. 72.Lekhraj

  73. 73.Inder Mohan Shingari

  74. 74.Sunil Dutt Sharma

  75. 75.Arun Kumar

  76. 76.Ram Chander

  77. 77.Anil Kumar

  78. 78.Gopal Sharma

  79. 79.Gurdev Singh

  80. 80.Shyam Lal

  81. 81.Gurcharan Singh Saini

  82. 82.Kasturi Lal

  83. 83.Satish Kumar

  84. 84.Sheo Ram

  85. 85.Kuldip Singh

  86. 86.Shiv Ram

  87. 87.Suresh Kumar

  88. 88.Jasbir Singh

  89. 89.Jai Ram

  90. 90.Pawan Chawla

  91. 91.Karnail Singh

  92. 92.Harish Kumar

  93. 93.Satwant Kaur Sethi

  94. 94.Madan Lal Sethi

  95. 95.Naresh Kumar

  96. 96.Naresh Kumar Soni

  97. 97.Nagender Kumar Jindal

  98. 98.Joginder Kumar

  99. 99.Deepak

  100. 100.Geeta Walia

  101. 101.Satish Kumar

  102. 102.Sikandar Lal

  103. 103.Dayal Chand

  104. 104.Lakhmir Singh

  105. 105.Tilak Raj Bhandari

  106. 106.Kailash Rani

  107. 107.Ashok Kumar

  108. 108.Ashok Kumar

  109. 109.Ripu Daman

  110. 110.Satish Kumar

  111. 111.Naresh Kumar

  112. 112.Ramesh Kumar

  113. 113.Jeet Ram

  114. 114.Om Parkash

  115. 115.Surender Kumar

  116. 116.Surinder Kumar

  117. 117.Raj Kumar

  118. 118.Rajinder Kumar

  119. 119.Prem Chand

  120. 120.Shekhar chander

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Nand Kishore And Others

  3. 3.Avinash Kumar

  4. 4.Additional Chief Secretary

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF

    Summary of CWP/14597/2026: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of five connected petitions challenging a notification dated 22.04.2026 that amended the Haryana Targeted Public Distribution System Order 2022 by imposing a minimum age requirement for PDS distributorship eligibility. The State conceded that the amended conditions would apply only to licenses issued after the amendment, not to existing licenses or their renewals, thereby removing the embargo on the petitioners. The court accordingly disposed of all petitions as the petitioners' grievances no longer survived. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14597/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP/14597/2026: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of five connected petitions challenging a notification dated 22.04.2026 that amended the Haryana Targeted Public Distribution System Order 2022 by imposing a minimum age requirement for PDS distributorship eligibility. The State conceded that the amended conditions would apply only to licenses issued after the amendment, not to existing licenses or their renewals, thereby removing the embargo on the petitioners. The court accordingly disposed of all petitions as the petitioners' grievances no longer survived. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case