HARPREET SINGH ALIAS HARRY vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/26672/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010795792026

Filing Number

CRM-M/37151/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26672/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARPREET SINGH ALIAS HARRY

    Adv. ANMOL PURI

  2. 2.HARPREET SINGH@HARRY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.HARPREET SINGH@HARRY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Harpreet Singh @ Harry in his third bail petition for alleged NDPS offences involving 202 gms of heroin. The court held that after 19 months in custody, with non-commercial quantity recovered, weak evidence of "drug money," no recovery remaining, slow trial progress, and no risk of tampering, bail was warranted as the presumption of innocence and right to speedy trial under Article 21 outweighed prosecution concerns. Bail was granted subject to furnishing bonds and conditions including non-interference with witnesses and remaining in India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26672/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Harpreet Singh @ Harry in his third bail petition for alleged NDPS offences involving 202 gms of heroin. The court held that after 19 months in custody, with non-commercial quantity recovered, weak evidence of "drug money," no recovery remaining, slow trial progress, and no risk of tampering, bail was warranted as the presumption of innocence and right to speedy trial under Article 21 outweighed prosecution concerns. Bail was granted subject to furnishing bonds and conditions including non-interference with witnesses and remaining in India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case