ANIL KUKREJA vs AMRINDER SINGH AND OTHERS — CR/4075/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010793142026

Filing Number

CR/28742/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

CR/4075/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Coram

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Category

30.8 - MACT ( 555 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL KUKREJA

    Adv. ABHINAV SOOD

  2. 2.ANIL KMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMRINDER SINGH AND OTHERS

  2. 2.ANIL KMAR

  3. 3.SIMMU

  4. 4.INSU CO

  5. 5.COMPETENT AUTOMOBILES

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Virinder AggarwalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Anil Kukreja's revision petition challenging the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's rejection of his application to be deleted as a respondent in a motor accident claim. Though the petitioner claimed he had transferred the vehicle to a dealer in July 2022 before the November 2023 accident occurred, the Court held that the alleged transfer and its circumstances are disputed factual questions requiring evidence adjudication at trial, not summary proceedings. Since the petitioner remained the registered owner on the accident date under Motor Vehicles Act Section 2(30), he cannot seek absolution from liability merely on assertions without evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/4075/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Anil Kukreja's revision petition challenging the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's rejection of his application to be deleted as a respondent in a motor accident claim. Though the petitioner claimed he had transferred the vehicle to a dealer in July 2022 before the November 2023 accident occurred, the Court held that the alleged transfer and its circumstances are disputed factual questions requiring evidence adjudication at trial, not summary proceedings. Since the petitioner remained the registered owner on the accident date under Motor Vehicles Act Section 2(30), he cannot seek absolution from liability merely on assertions without evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case