JAGDEEP SINGH vs BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER — CR/4072/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010792032026

Filing Number

CR/28714/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

CR/4072/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Coram

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Category

30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGDEEP SINGH

    Adv. ARIHANT JAIN

  2. 2.JAGDEEP SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.JAGDEEP SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Parmod GoyalView PDF

    Summary of CR/4072/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Jagdeep Singh's revision petition challenging the lower court's rejection of his application to dismiss the bank's suit on limitation grounds. The court held that while the loan was taken in 2013 and the suit filed in 2024 (11 years later), the bank's pleadings showed reliance on a debt acknowledgment dated January 2022, which under Section 18 of the Limitation Act could restart the limitation period, making the suit potentially valid. The court ruled that limitation issues must be determined at trial after evidence, not at the pleading stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/4072/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CR/4072/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Jagdeep Singh's revision petition challenging the lower court's rejection of his application to dismiss the bank's suit on limitation grounds. The court held that while the loan was taken in 2013 and the suit filed in 2024 (11 years later), the bank's pleadings showed reliance on a debt acknowledgment dated January 2022, which under Section 18 of the Limitation Act could restart the limitation period, making the suit potentially valid. The court ruled that limitation issues must be determined at trial after evidence, not at the pleading stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case