KULDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/14619/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010791752026

e-Filing Number

07-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28694/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14619/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Coram

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Category

18.14 - ENHANCE & APPORTIONMENT OF COMP ON ACC OF ACQ/REQ ( 451 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS

    Adv. SANDEEP YADAV

  2. 2.Kuldeep singh and others

  3. 3.Rohatash singh

  4. 4.Leela Ram

  5. 5.Chhaju Ram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Kuldeep singh and others

  3. 3.Rohatash singh

  4. 4.Leela Ram

  5. 5.Chhaju Ram

  6. 6.Executive Engineer Provisional division PWD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harkesh ManujaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/14619/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the writ petition filed by Kuldeep Singh and others for non-prosecution. The petitioners sought directions to release interest payments on delayed annuity amounts relating to land acquisition by the State of Haryana. Since no representative appeared for the petitioners despite the matter being called twice, the court inferred lack of interest in pursuing the petition and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14619/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/14619/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the writ petition filed by Kuldeep Singh and others for non-prosecution. The petitioners sought directions to release interest payments on delayed annuity amounts relating to land acquisition by the State of Haryana. Since no representative appeared for the petitioners despite the matter being called twice, the court inferred lack of interest in pursuing the petition and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case