VIJAY LAKSHMI AND ANOTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/14636/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010791712026

e-Filing Number

07-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28699/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14636/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY LAKSHMI AND ANOTHERS

    Adv. DINESH MAHAJAN

  2. 2.Vijay Lakshmi and anothers

  3. 3.Narinder Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Vijay Lakshmi and anothers

  3. 3.Narinder Kumar

  4. 4.Deputy Commissioner

  5. 5.District Development and Panchayat Officer

  6. 6.Block Development and Panchayat Officer

  7. 7.Ajit Kumar Member Panchayat

  8. 8.Kuldeep Singh Member Panchayat

  9. 9.Asha Rani Member Panchayat

  10. 10.Sunita Saini Member Panchayat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/14636/2026 The petitioners (Gram Panchayat members from Village Niamta, Gurdaspur) sought a mandamus to remove certain members (respondents 6-9) for non-attendance at meetings and failure to support developmental works. The court disposed of the petition after the State counsel committed that the District Development and Panchayat Officer would consider the petitioners' response to the Show Cause Notice (regarding unutilized grant of Rs.4,54,477) and pass an appropriate speaking order after affording due hearing to all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14636/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/14636/2026 The petitioners (Gram Panchayat members from Village Niamta, Gurdaspur) sought a mandamus to remove certain members (respondents 6-9) for non-attendance at meetings and failure to support developmental works. The court disposed of the petition after the State counsel committed that the District Development and Panchayat Officer would consider the petitioners' response to the Show Cause Notice (regarding unutilized grant of Rs.4,54,477) and pass an appropriate speaking order after affording due hearing to all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case