LAXMI DEVI GAURAV GUPTA vs SATYAJIT — CRM-M/26609/2026
Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010791612026
e-Filing Number
07-05-2026
Filing Number
CRM-M/36926/2026
Filing Date
07-May-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/26609/2026
Registration Date
08-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth
Coram
Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth
Category
48.2 - CRIMINAL TRANSFER (DJ/ADJ/SJ/ASJ) ( 154 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAXMI DEVI GAURAV GUPTA
-
2.LAXMI DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SATYAJIT
-
2.LAXMI DEVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF
Case Summary: CRM-M-26609-2026 Laxmi Devi (aged 61) sought transfer of respondent Satyajit's appeal from the Sessions Court, Rohtak, contending he failed to deposit 20% compensation as directed within the stipulated time following his Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act conviction. The High Court noted the statutory provision prescribes 60 days (extendable by 30 days) for deposit, implying the petitioner's complaint was premature. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with petitioner's counsel's permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/26609/2026
Case Summary: CRM-M-26609-2026 Laxmi Devi (aged 61) sought transfer of respondent Satyajit's appeal from the Sessions Court, Rohtak, contending he failed to deposit 20% compensation as directed within the stipulated time following his Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act conviction. The High Court noted the statutory provision prescribes 60 days (extendable by 30 days) for deposit, implying the petitioner's complaint was premature. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with petitioner's counsel's permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts