BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED AND ORS vs DISTRICT LEVEL MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL AND ANR — CWP/14532/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010788532026

e-Filing Number

07-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28545/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14532/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED AND ORS

    Adv. Deepak Jindal (Dr.)

  2. 2.Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and Ors

  3. 3.Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

  4. 4.Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DISTRICT LEVEL MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL AND ANR

  2. 2.Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and Ors

  3. 3.Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP-14532-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed BSNL's petition challenging an MSME Facilitation Council award of Rs. 11,69,066 in interest for delayed bill payments. The court held that BSNL had raised the jurisdiction question in an earlier petition (CWP-14235-2022), which was allowed with directions for fresh proceedings before the Council. Since BSNL subsequently appeared before the Council without challenging the earlier judgment, principles of constructive res judicata and estoppel barred BSNL from re-raising the jurisdiction issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14532/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP-14532-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed BSNL's petition challenging an MSME Facilitation Council award of Rs. 11,69,066 in interest for delayed bill payments. The court held that BSNL had raised the jurisdiction question in an earlier petition (CWP-14235-2022), which was allowed with directions for fresh proceedings before the Council. Since BSNL subsequently appeared before the Council without challenging the earlier judgment, principles of constructive res judicata and estoppel barred BSNL from re-raising the jurisdiction issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case