PARMINDER SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA — CWP/15015/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010786772026

e-Filing Number

06-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28475/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15015/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Category

63.62 - DISPUTES REGARDING PASSPORT ( 755 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARMINDER SINGH

    Adv. ANMOLDEEP SINGH

  2. 2.Union of India

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

  2. 2.Union of India

  3. 3.State of Punjab

  4. 4.Senior Superintendent of Police

  5. 5.The Regional Passport Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of Parminder Singh's writ petition seeking mandamus to compel issuance of a passport. The petitioner's 2017 passport application was rejected due to a 2010 criminal conviction (3-year imprisonment), but he argued the conviction was over five years old and no longer a bar to passport issuance. The court accepted the respondents' undertaking that upon submission of a fresh "Re-issuance of Passport" application with complete documents, it would be decided within eight weeks in accordance with law, and accordingly disposed of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15015/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of Parminder Singh's writ petition seeking mandamus to compel issuance of a passport. The petitioner's 2017 passport application was rejected due to a 2010 criminal conviction (3-year imprisonment), but he argued the conviction was over five years old and no longer a bar to passport issuance. The court accepted the respondents' undertaking that upon submission of a fresh "Re-issuance of Passport" application with complete documents, it would be decided within eight weeks in accordance with law, and accordingly disposed of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case