ARSHDEEP @ ARSHPREET @ MACHAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/26472/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010786082026

Filing Number

CRM-M/36707/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26472/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARSHDEEP @ ARSHPREET @ MACHAR

    Adv. RAGHAV SONI

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vinod S. BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: Arshpreet @ Machar v. State of Punjab The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to petitioner Arshpreet in an NDPS case involving 300 grams of heroin recovered from a co-accused's polythene bag. The court found arguable issues regarding the petitioner's conscious possession of contraband, noting no direct recovery from him and that investigation was incomplete with 16 prosecution witnesses yet to be examined. Bail was granted on standard conditions including a surety bond and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26472/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Arshpreet @ Machar v. State of Punjab The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to petitioner Arshpreet in an NDPS case involving 300 grams of heroin recovered from a co-accused's polythene bag. The court found arguable issues regarding the petitioner's conscious possession of contraband, noting no direct recovery from him and that investigation was incomplete with 16 prosecution witnesses yet to be examined. Bail was granted on standard conditions including a surety bond and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case