BAKHSHO vs ARYA SAMAJ SABHA, RAHON AND ANOTHER — CR/3983/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010785302026

Filing Number

CR/28441/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

CR/3983/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Coram

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Category

30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAKHSHO

    Adv. DINESH NAGAR

  2. 2.ARYA SAMAJ SABHA RAHON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARYA SAMAJ SABHA, RAHON AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.ARYA SAMAJ SABHA RAHON

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Parmod GoyalView PDF

    Case Summary: CR/3983/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed petitioner Bakhsho's civil revision petition challenging an order rejecting her objections to possession warrants. Bakhsho, wife of the judgment-debtor, claimed rights to the disputed property based on a 2007 family settlement with her husband, but the court found her claims derived solely through the judgment-debtor, who was adjudged a trespasser with no legal rights. The court held that since the judgment-debtor himself had no valid claim, anyone deriving rights through him is bound by the decree and cannot claim independent protection; Bakhsho's possession was merely permissive possession granted by an encroacher subject to eviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/3983/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR/3983/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed petitioner Bakhsho's civil revision petition challenging an order rejecting her objections to possession warrants. Bakhsho, wife of the judgment-debtor, claimed rights to the disputed property based on a 2007 family settlement with her husband, but the court found her claims derived solely through the judgment-debtor, who was adjudged a trespasser with no legal rights. The court held that since the judgment-debtor himself had no valid claim, anyone deriving rights through him is bound by the decree and cannot claim independent protection; Bakhsho's possession was merely permissive possession granted by an encroacher subject to eviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case