GURINDER SINGH SIDHU AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/26974/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010785102026

Filing Number

CRM-M/36586/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26974/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Alok Jain

Coram

Mr. Justice Alok Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

38.23 - QUASHING COMROMISE U/S 482 CRPC CRIME AGST WOMEN ( 643 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURINDER SINGH SIDHU AND OTHERS

    Adv. NAVEEN SHARMA

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.HARLEEN KAUR

  4. 4.RAJWANT KAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.HARLEEN KAUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Alok JainView PDF

    The High Court dismissed the petition for quashing FIR No.170 (registered under IPC Sections 406, 498-A, 120-B) as withdrawn, based on a compromise dated 29.01.2026. The court noted this was the third petition with the same error in documentation (compromise and Power of Attorney dated differently), and while accepting the withdrawal request, cautioned that future petitions involving similar mistakes would not be permitted, imposing a Rs.5,000 cost deposit requirement for any fresh filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26974/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court dismissed the petition for quashing FIR No.170 (registered under IPC Sections 406, 498-A, 120-B) as withdrawn, based on a compromise dated 29.01.2026. The court noted this was the third petition with the same error in documentation (compromise and Power of Attorney dated differently), and while accepting the withdrawal request, cautioned that future petitions involving similar mistakes would not be permitted, imposing a Rs.5,000 cost deposit requirement for any fresh filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case