NARESH KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS — CWP/14552/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 14. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010784982026
e-Filing Number
06-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/28439/2026
Filing Date
07-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/14552/2026
Registration Date
07-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Namit Kumar
Coram
Mr. Justice Namit Kumar
Category
68.1 - GOVT SERVICE (PB)-SB ( 771 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NARESH KUMAR
Adv. R S MANHAS
-
2.Naresh Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
-
2.Naresh Kumar
-
3.The Secretary Government of Punjab Department of Irrigation
-
4.The Secretary to Government Punjab, Department of Personnel
-
5.Executive Engineer, Project and R M Division, Ranjit Sagar Dam
-
6.Land Acquisition Collector
-
7.Chief Engineer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF
Case Summary: CWP-14552-2026 Naresh Kumar v. State of Punjab and Others (High Court of Punjab and Haryana, 11.05.2026) The court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging rejection of his employment claim under the Ranjit Sagar Dam Rehabilitation & Resettlement Scheme (1993). Although the petitioner's mother's land was acquired for dam construction, his claim was rejected because another family member (Chain Singh) had already received employment under the policy. The court held the petitioner's plea was barred by substantial delay and laches—he approached the court 28 years after acquisition completion and 12 years after formal rejection. The court clarified that oustee employment is a one-time concession (not a vested right) meant for immediate relief, and the long delay eliminated any continuing cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/14552/2026
Case Summary: CWP-14552-2026 Naresh Kumar v. State of Punjab and Others (High Court of Punjab and Haryana, 11.05.2026) The court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging rejection of his employment claim under the Ranjit Sagar Dam Rehabilitation & Resettlement Scheme (1993). Although the petitioner's mother's land was acquired for dam construction, his claim was rejected because another family member (Chain Singh) had already received employment under the policy. The court held the petitioner's plea was barred by substantial delay and laches—he approached the court 28 years after acquisition completion and 12 years after formal rejection. The court clarified that oustee employment is a one-time concession (not a vested right) meant for immediate relief, and the long delay eliminated any continuing cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts