RAKESH KUMAR SINGLA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/14545/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010784902026

e-Filing Number

07-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28418/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14545/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Category

20.4 - SC OSB (PUNJAB) ( 466 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH KUMAR SINGLA

    Adv. VIVEK SHARMA

  2. 2.Rakesh Kumar Singla

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Rakesh Kumar Singla

  3. 3.The Managing Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/14545/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed retired engineer Rakesh Kumar Singla's petition seeking revised ACP (Assured Career Progression) pay benefits from earlier dates (2002 and 2007) instead of the dates granted (2003 and 2008). The court found the petition barred by delay and laches, as Singla filed it 8 years after retirement and 18 years after the cause of action arose, without reasonable explanation, despite similar employees obtaining relief through earlier court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14545/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/14545/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed retired engineer Rakesh Kumar Singla's petition seeking revised ACP (Assured Career Progression) pay benefits from earlier dates (2002 and 2007) instead of the dates granted (2003 and 2008). The court found the petition barred by delay and laches, as Singla filed it 8 years after retirement and 18 years after the cause of action arose, without reasonable explanation, despite similar employees obtaining relief through earlier court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case