UNION OF INDIA vs EX SEPOY ANIL KUMAR SHARMA NO 13747937H — CWP/14492/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010784702026
e-Filing Number
06-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/28398/2026
Filing Date
07-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/14492/2026
Registration Date
07-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Category
4.11 - ORDERS AGAINST ARMED FORCE TRIBUNAL(CIVIL) ( 328 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA
Adv. Maneesh Kumar Bali
-
2.Union of India
-
3.The Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench Chandigarh
-
4.Principal Controller of Defence Accounts Pensions
-
5.Officer in Charge Records
Respondent(s)
-
1.EX SEPOY ANIL KUMAR SHARMA NO 13747937H
-
2.Union of India
-
3.The Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench Chandigarh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: CWP-14492-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting Ex-Sepoy Anil Kumar Sharma disability pension at 75% (rounded up from 55%). The court held that since Sharma was medically fit at enrolment and contracted disabilities (prolapse intervertebral disc, diabetes, hypertension) during service, these are presumed attributable to military service under settled Supreme Court precedent. The court upheld both the grant of disability pension and the rounding-off benefit, finding no perversity in the Tribunal's orders and dismissing both petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/14492/2026
CASE SUMMARY: CWP-14492-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting Ex-Sepoy Anil Kumar Sharma disability pension at 75% (rounded up from 55%). The court held that since Sharma was medically fit at enrolment and contracted disabilities (prolapse intervertebral disc, diabetes, hypertension) during service, these are presumed attributable to military service under settled Supreme Court precedent. The court upheld both the grant of disability pension and the rounding-off benefit, finding no perversity in the Tribunal's orders and dismissing both petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts