HARYANA WAREHOUSING CORPORATION vs DARSHAN LAL TANWAR — RSA/1153/2007

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Apr-2007

CNR: PHHC010784232007

Filing Number

RSA/1153/2007

Filing Date

17-Apr-2007

Registration No

RSA/1153/2007

Registration Date

17-Apr-2007

Judge

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Coram

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Category

26.1 - RSA SERVICE ( 497 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARYANA WAREHOUSING CORPORATION

    Adv. SUNIL PANWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DARSHAN LAL TANWAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Haryana Warehousing Corporation's Second Appeal as infructuous because the decree in favor of Darshan Lal Tanwar had already been satisfied and all payments released, with no stay order having been granted. The appellant's counsel declined to pursue the appeal given the changed circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Aug-2012

    —

    Mr. Justice Gurmit Ram

  4. 09-Sep-2008

    —

    Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Mittal

  5. 12-Aug-2008

    —

    Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur

  6. 28-Mar-2008

    —

    Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann

  7. 04-Mar-2008

    —

    Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann

  8. 22-Feb-2008

    —

    Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann

  9. 16-Oct-2007

    —

    Mr. Justice Ajai Lamba

  10. 12-Jul-2007

    —

    Mr. Justice Ajai Lamba

  11. 26-Apr-2007

    —

    Mr. Justice R.P. Sethi

  12. 18-Apr-2007

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 17-Apr-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/1153/2007

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Haryana Warehousing Corporation's Second Appeal as infructuous because the decree in favor of Darshan Lal Tanwar had already been satisfied and all payments released, with no stay order having been granted. The appellant's counsel declined to pursue the appeal given the changed circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case