RAM BILAS SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS vs ASHUTOSH SHARMA — CR/4055/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010784082026

Filing Number

CR/28402/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

CR/4055/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Category

30.55 - CR FILED BY TENANT AGNST FO/JUDG IN RENT ACT HRY. ( 532 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM BILAS SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS

    Adv. RAHUL DESWAL

  2. 2.ASHUTOSH SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHUTOSH SHARMA

  2. 2.ASHUTOSH SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the tenant's revision petition challenging his eviction from a Jind shop, upholding concurrent findings that the landlord's requirement was genuinely bona fide. The court rejected the tenant's arguments that the landlord owned alternative properties and was financially affluent, noting the tenant had already occupied the premises for 11 years since the 2015 ejectment petition. The tenant was granted until September 30, 2026 to vacate, subject to clearing arrears within two weeks and paying mesne profits at the previous rent rate; failure to vacate by this deadline would incur ₹50,000 monthly charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/4055/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the tenant's revision petition challenging his eviction from a Jind shop, upholding concurrent findings that the landlord's requirement was genuinely bona fide. The court rejected the tenant's arguments that the landlord owned alternative properties and was financially affluent, noting the tenant had already occupied the premises for 11 years since the 2015 ejectment petition. The tenant was granted until September 30, 2026 to vacate, subject to clearing arrears within two weeks and paying mesne profits at the previous rent rate; failure to vacate by this deadline would incur ₹50,000 monthly charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case