AKHIL MAHAJAN vs STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY OFFICE — CWP/14743/2026

Case under Protection of Human Rights Act Section 21(5). Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC010783502026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

13th May 2026

e-Filing Number

06-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28369/2026

Filing Date

07-05-2026

Registration No

CWP/14743/2026

Registration Date

11-05-2026

Judge

THE CHIEF JUSTICE , MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY

Coram

THE CHIEF JUSTICE , MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY

Category

80 - HUMAN RIGHTS CASES ( 813 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS ACT Section 21(5)

Petitioner(s)

AKHIL MAHAJAN

Adv. RANJEET SINGH CHAUHAN

Akhil Mahajan

Respondent(s)

STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY OFFICE

Akhil Mahajan

Director General of Police, Chandigarh Police Headquarters

Additional Chief Secretary, Town and Country Planning Department

Director, Town and Country Planning Department

Amit Khatri, IAS

ASK Singh, IAS

Station House Officer

Haryana Human Rights Commission, Haryana

Orders

13-05-2026
THE CHIEF JUSTICE,MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY

Case Summary: CWP/14743/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Dr. Akhil Mahajan's petition challenging an inquiry report into alleged misconduct by a senior IAS officer, finding it premature to intervene. The court declined to quash the report or order a Special Investigation Team, instead directing the Haryana Human Rights Commission to expedite its decision on the complaint within two months, thereby allowing the existing grievance mechanism to proceed without judicial commentary on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/14743/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Dr. Akhil Mahajan's petition challenging an inquiry report into alleged misconduct by a senior IAS officer, finding it premature to intervene. The court declined to quash the report or order a Special Investigation Team, instead directing the Haryana Human Rights Commission to expedite its decision on the complaint within two months, thereby allowing the existing grievance mechanism to proceed without judicial commentary on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Protection of Human Rights Act All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case