AKHIL MAHAJAN vs STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY OFFICE — CWP/14743/2026
Case under Protection of Human Rights Act Section 21(5). Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010783502026
e-Filing Number
06-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/28369/2026
Filing Date
07-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/14743/2026
Registration Date
11-May-2026
Judge
The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry
Coram
The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry
Category
80 - HUMAN RIGHTS CASES ( 813 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AKHIL MAHAJAN
Adv. RANJEET SINGH CHAUHAN
-
2.Akhil Mahajan
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY OFFICE
-
2.Akhil Mahajan
-
3.Director General of Police, Chandigarh Police Headquarters
-
4.Additional Chief Secretary, Town and Country Planning Department
-
5.Director, Town and Country Planning Department
-
6.Amit Khatri, IAS
-
7.ASK Singh, IAS
-
8.Station House Officer
-
9.Haryana Human Rights Commission, Haryana
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
The Chief Justice,mr. Justice Sanjiv BerryView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/14743/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Dr. Akhil Mahajan's petition challenging an inquiry report into alleged misconduct by a senior IAS officer, finding it premature to intervene. The court declined to quash the report or order a Special Investigation Team, instead directing the Haryana Human Rights Commission to expedite its decision on the complaint within two months, thereby allowing the existing grievance mechanism to proceed without judicial commentary on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/14743/2026
Case Summary: CWP/14743/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Dr. Akhil Mahajan's petition challenging an inquiry report into alleged misconduct by a senior IAS officer, finding it premature to intervene. The court declined to quash the report or order a Special Investigation Team, instead directing the Haryana Human Rights Commission to expedite its decision on the complaint within two months, thereby allowing the existing grievance mechanism to proceed without judicial commentary on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts