TARSEM SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/14530/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010783452026

e-Filing Number

06-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28363/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14530/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Category

58.1 - GOVT SERVICE (HY) ( 705 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TARSEM SINGH AND OTHERS

    Adv. AMAN NAIN

  2. 2.Tarsem Singh And Others

  3. 3.Director, Women and Child Development Department Haryana

  4. 4.Devinder Sharma

  5. 5.Amit Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Tarsem Singh And Others

  3. 3.Director, Women and Child Development Department Haryana

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Women and Child Development Department to reconsider the petitioners' cases for regularization as Clerk-cum-Data Entry Operators within six weeks, following the Supreme Court's upholding of Haryana's 2014 regularization policy for contractual employees with three years of service. The court disposed the petition with instructions to pass a reasoned order after examining the petitioners' eligibility under the policy criteria. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14530/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Women and Child Development Department to reconsider the petitioners' cases for regularization as Clerk-cum-Data Entry Operators within six weeks, following the Supreme Court's upholding of Haryana's 2014 regularization policy for contractual employees with three years of service. The court disposed the petition with instructions to pass a reasoned order after examining the petitioners' eligibility under the policy criteria. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case