SH SANJAY VIRMANI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/14632/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010783292026

e-Filing Number

06-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28360/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14632/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Bench Type

Double

Category

8.4 - HUID HARYANA((HOUSING URBAN INDL. DEVELOPMENT) ( 405 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SH SANJAY VIRMANI

    Adv. VIBHAV JAIN

  2. 2.State of Haryana and Others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana and Others

  3. 3.Director, Department of Town and Country Planning

  4. 4.District Town Planner Enforcement, Faridabad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,mr. Justice Suvir SehgalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of Sanjay Virmani's writ petition seeking a direction to decide his land use change application. The court directed the competent authority to issue a final decision within 60 days from resubmission of the application as per relevant rules, noting the petitioner had already received personal hearings as per court's previous order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14632/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of Sanjay Virmani's writ petition seeking a direction to decide his land use change application. The court directed the competent authority to issue a final decision within 60 days from resubmission of the application as per relevant rules, noting the petitioner had already received personal hearings as per court's previous order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case