BANKA SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/26607/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010781022026

Filing Number

CRM-M/36391/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26607/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BANKA SINGH

    Adv. MANIK MAKKAR

  2. 2.BANKA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.BANKA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/26607/2026 The Punjab High Court dismissed Banka Singh's petition seeking regular bail in a drug trafficking case involving recovery of 20kg poppy husk and 4000 Tramadol tablets. The court held that under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the twin conditions for bail in commercial quantity cases are mandatory, and without satisfying these conditions, bail cannot be granted. However, recognizing the petitioner's prolonged custody of over 6 years, the court directed the trial court to conclude proceedings expeditiously within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26607/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/26607/2026 The Punjab High Court dismissed Banka Singh's petition seeking regular bail in a drug trafficking case involving recovery of 20kg poppy husk and 4000 Tramadol tablets. The court held that under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the twin conditions for bail in commercial quantity cases are mandatory, and without satisfying these conditions, bail cannot be granted. However, recognizing the petitioner's prolonged custody of over 6 years, the court directed the trial court to conclude proceedings expeditiously within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case