MS RBCL PILETECH INFRA vs MS SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED — ARB/227/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 14/15. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC010780992026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

11th May 2026

e-Filing Number

05-05-2026

Filing Number

ARB/28241/2026

Filing Date

06-05-2026

Registration No

ARB/227/2026

Registration Date

07-05-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI

Coram

MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI

Category

69.4 - ARBITRATION U/S 11 (LESS THAN 5 CRORE) ( 938 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

15th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 14/15

Petitioner(s)

MS RBCL PILETECH INFRA

Adv. Ajay Pal Singh Saini

Respondent(s)

MS SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED

Orders

15-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI

Case Summary: ARB/227/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed RBCL Piletech Infra's petition to terminate the arbitrator's mandate, finding the petition misconceived and lacking territorial jurisdiction. The arbitration clause clearly specified Chennai as the venue, the arbitrator was validly appointed by an independent institution (Madras Arbitration Solution LLP), and the petitioner had already filed a pending challenge before the same arbitrator under Section 16, making the Punjab court petition premature and inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ARB/227/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed RBCL Piletech Infra's petition to terminate the arbitrator's mandate, finding the petition misconceived and lacking territorial jurisdiction. The arbitration clause clearly specified Chennai as the venue, the arbitrator was validly appointed by an independent institution (Madras Arbitration Solution LLP), and the petitioner had already filed a pending challenge before the same arbitrator under Section 16, making the Punjab court petition premature and inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case