DINESH TEWATIA ARSHEEMA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/14607/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 14. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010779332026

e-Filing Number

06-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28165/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14607/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DINESH TEWATIA ARSHEEMA

  2. 2.State of Haryana and Others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana and Others

  3. 3.Director General Horticulture Department

  4. 4.Deputy Director Horticulture Hodal Palwal Haryana

  5. 5.District Horticulture officer Palwal Haryana

  6. 6.Subject Matter Specialist Senior Integrated Horticulture Development Center

  7. 7.Haryana Kaushal Rojgar Nigam Limited

  8. 8.TDS Placements and Services Private Limited

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the competent authority to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 29.05.2024 and CM Window application dated 12.01.2026 regarding non-grant of monthly pay and non-implementation of emoluments office memorandum within six weeks, after providing hearing opportunity, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14607/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the competent authority to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 29.05.2024 and CM Window application dated 12.01.2026 regarding non-grant of monthly pay and non-implementation of emoluments office memorandum within six weeks, after providing hearing opportunity, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case