WILLIAM vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRM-M/26783/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010779122026

Filing Number

CRM-M/36331/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26783/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Coram

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Category

47 - CRIMINAL MISC.(DIRECTION) ( 215 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.WILLIAM

    Adv. RANJAN LAKHANPAL

  2. 2.WILLIAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.WILLIAN

  3. 3.DGP, PUNJAB POLICE

  4. 4.DIG, PATIALA RANGE

  5. 5.SSP, PATIALA

  6. 6.SP, HEADQUARTERS, PATIALA

  7. 7.SP, INVESTIGATION, PATIALA

  8. 8.SUKHWINDER SINGH

  9. 9.SHO (Station House Officer), PS (Police Station) TRIPURI, PATIALA

  10. 10.PUNJAB MEDICAL COUNCIAL

  11. 11.DR BHUPESH GARG

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition seeking directions to register an FIR against a private respondent for medical ethics violations, by directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Patiala, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.10.2025 and decide it within one month. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's statement that this direction would satisfy the petitioner's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26783/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition seeking directions to register an FIR against a private respondent for medical ethics violations, by directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Patiala, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.10.2025 and decide it within one month. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's statement that this direction would satisfy the petitioner's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case