KULDEEP KUMAR MADAN PAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/14481/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 14. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010778782026

e-Filing Number

06-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28136/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14481/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Category

58.1 - GOVT SERVICE (HY) ( 705 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULDEEP KUMAR MADAN PAL

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.Principal Chief Conservator of Forests Haryana

  4. 4.Divisional Forest Officer kaithal haryana

  5. 5.Haryana Kaushal Rojgar Nigam Limited

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/14481/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition without issuing the requested writs of certiorari and mandamus. Instead, the Court directed the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Haryana to take a final decision on the petitioner's contract renewal recommendation within six weeks. Key Reasoning: The Court found that no formal order had yet been passed on the petitioner's contract renewal recommendation for FY 2026-27 under Haryana Kaushal Rozgar Nigam. Rather than granting relief prematurely, the Court required the authorities to decide the matter through proper channels. The State counsel assured compliance, allowing the petitioner to withdraw the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14481/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/14481/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition without issuing the requested writs of certiorari and mandamus. Instead, the Court directed the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Haryana to take a final decision on the petitioner's contract renewal recommendation within six weeks. Key Reasoning: The Court found that no formal order had yet been passed on the petitioner's contract renewal recommendation for FY 2026-27 under Haryana Kaushal Rozgar Nigam. Rather than granting relief prematurely, the Court required the authorities to decide the matter through proper channels. The State counsel assured compliance, allowing the petitioner to withdraw the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case