KRISHAN KUMAR vs HARYANA POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS — CWP/14551/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010778422026

e-Filing Number

06-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28125/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14551/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Category

20.11 - SCOSB (HARYANA) ( 453 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHAN KUMAR

    Adv. KARTAR SINGH MALIK (I)

  2. 2.Krishan Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARYANA POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Krishan Kumar

  3. 3.Chief Engineer

  4. 4.Chief Engineer,

  5. 5.All India Council for Technical Education

  6. 6.University Grant Commission

  7. 7.Anil Kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/14551/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Krishan Kumar's petition challenging his exclusion from promotion to Assistant Engineer by Haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited. Rather than adjudicating merits, the court directed the competent authority (Respondent No.2) to decide the petitioner's objections dated 31.08.2022 and legal notice dated 08.05.2025 within three months, passing a reasoned order, with relief to be granted if the petitioner is found entitled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14551/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/14551/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Krishan Kumar's petition challenging his exclusion from promotion to Assistant Engineer by Haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited. Rather than adjudicating merits, the court directed the competent authority (Respondent No.2) to decide the petitioner's objections dated 31.08.2022 and legal notice dated 08.05.2025 within three months, passing a reasoned order, with relief to be granted if the petitioner is found entitled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case