UDAI LAL DANGI vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/26532/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010778352026

Filing Number

CRM-M/36216/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26532/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UDAI LAL DANGI

    Adv. PARVINDER MOAR

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-26532-2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Udai Lal Dangi's bail petition in an NDPS Act case involving 70 kg of poppy husk. The court found that Dangi, as a habitual offender with 15 prior criminal cases spanning 17 years (including convictions and multiple NDPS/Excise Act cases), could not satisfy the twin conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Although named primarily through co-accused disclosure statements, Dangi's ownership of the trucks used and his extensive criminal history disqualified him from bail consideration despite co-accused receiving bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26532/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-26532-2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Udai Lal Dangi's bail petition in an NDPS Act case involving 70 kg of poppy husk. The court found that Dangi, as a habitual offender with 15 prior criminal cases spanning 17 years (including convictions and multiple NDPS/Excise Act cases), could not satisfy the twin conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Although named primarily through co-accused disclosure statements, Dangi's ownership of the trucks used and his extensive criminal history disqualified him from bail consideration despite co-accused receiving bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case