RAJ KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS — CWP/14755/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 and 227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010778252026

e-Filing Number

06-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28108/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14755/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa

Category

58.22 - SERVICE-HARYANA POLICE-RETIRAL BENEFITS ( 714 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 and 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR

    Adv. ANKUR LAL

  2. 2.Raj Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

  2. 2.Raj Kumar

  3. 3.The Director General of Police

  4. 4.The Superintendent of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh NalwaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Raj Kumar's writ petition challenging the rejection of his leave encashment claim, but allowed him to withdraw it with liberty to file a representation to authorities. The court permitted the petitioner to rely on Punjab Civil Service Rules Volume II (applicable at his 2010 dismissal) rather than the 2016 Haryana Rules used in rejection, though no delay condoning was granted for future submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14755/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Raj Kumar's writ petition challenging the rejection of his leave encashment claim, but allowed him to withdraw it with liberty to file a representation to authorities. The court permitted the petitioner to rely on Punjab Civil Service Rules Volume II (applicable at his 2010 dismissal) rather than the 2016 Haryana Rules used in rejection, though no delay condoning was granted for future submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case