SATBIR SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/14313/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC010777892026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

08th May 2026

e-Filing Number

05-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28119/2026

Filing Date

06-05-2026

Registration No

CWP/14313/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

Coram

MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

Bench Type

Double

Category

97.5 - VIRES (GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS) ( 868 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 226

Petitioner(s)

SATBIR SINGH AND OTHERS

Adv. Lokesh Sharma

STATE OF HARYANA and others

DIRECTOR GENERAL

ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY

SUBE SINGH

SATBIR

OM PARKASH

BHIM SINGH

VIR BHAN

Respondent(s)

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

STATE OF HARYANA and others

DIRECTOR GENERAL

ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY

Orders

11-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI,MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

Case Summary: CWP/14313/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of five connected petitions challenging a notification dated 22.04.2026 amending the Haryana Targeted Public Distribution System Order 2022, which imposed minimum age eligibility criteria for Public Distribution System distributorships. After the State conceded that the amended conditions would apply only to licenses issued after the amendment and not to existing licenses, the petitioners withdrew their challenge. The court disposed of the petitions as no grievance survived. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/14313/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of five connected petitions challenging a notification dated 22.04.2026 amending the Haryana Targeted Public Distribution System Order 2022, which imposed minimum age eligibility criteria for Public Distribution System distributorships. After the State conceded that the amended conditions would apply only to licenses issued after the amendment and not to existing licenses, the petitioners withdrew their challenge. The court disposed of the petitions as no grievance survived. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Code of Civil Procedure All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case