PRINCE KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/26409/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010776322026

Filing Number

CRM-M/36170/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26409/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRINCE KUMAR

    Adv. SANDEEP KUMAR

  2. 2.PRINCE KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.PRINCE KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/26409/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Prince Kumar's anticipatory bail petition on May 15, 2026. Kumar, a Patwari (revenue officer), was accused of conspiring with others to execute sale deeds and revenue mutations despite a subsisting civil court stay order dated January 24, 2023, allegedly excluding land from the court's jurisdiction through rapat entry No. 416 in July 2024. The court found prima facie evidence of active misuse of official position and tampering with revenue records in furtherance of criminal conspiracy, determining that custodial interrogation was necessary for effective investigation and that anticipatory bail—an extraordinary remedy—was inappropriate given the serious nature of the economic offence involving corruption by a government official. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26409/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/26409/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Prince Kumar's anticipatory bail petition on May 15, 2026. Kumar, a Patwari (revenue officer), was accused of conspiring with others to execute sale deeds and revenue mutations despite a subsisting civil court stay order dated January 24, 2023, allegedly excluding land from the court's jurisdiction through rapat entry No. 416 in July 2024. The court found prima facie evidence of active misuse of official position and tampering with revenue records in furtherance of criminal conspiracy, determining that custodial interrogation was necessary for effective investigation and that anticipatory bail—an extraordinary remedy—was inappropriate given the serious nature of the economic offence involving corruption by a government official. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case